DISCLAIMER

PLEASE READ THE DISCLAIMER AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE WHICH APPLIES TO ALL CONTENT IN THIS BLOG AS WELL AS ANY OTHER MATERIAL FROM WE ARE FUTURES TRADERS LLC. READING ANY CONTENT BELOW CONSTITUTES AN AGREEMENT BY ALL READERS THAT THEY HAVE READ AND AGREE TO ALL THAT IS SET FORTH IN THE DISCLAIMER AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE.


Wednesday, March 24, 2010

TO FADE OR NOT TO FADE, THAT IS THE QUESTION?


I don't know what it is about the human psyche, but so many of us always want to sell whats high and buy what is low. After all isn't that the old adage? Well you can really get into some trouble in the trading and investment world at times by doing exactly that. Shorting strong uptrends and buying strong downtrends can be very dangerous as we have seen in some very extreme trends in the last 2 years. Your timing better be good and your pockets big to be a trend fader. Every month there is a new gimmick about how to time the market better.

Make no mistake about it, timing techniques for determining trend changes are at best hit and miss. You may catch a few, but you also will get your pockets drained in the process of catching those few. I speak from experience here. The 2 most frustrating trading years I had were back in the mid 90's trying to implement techniques such as this. Fibonacci, reversal bars, Gann, all that crap that does not work. One of the best quotes I have ever heard was "If you draw enough lines on a chart something will happen at one of them." This is so true. One look at a Gann chart and I feel like Christopher Columbus looking at a map on his ship.

The Russell 2000 chart above is an example of a trend that has been tough to fade recently. Last week I posted about a shorting opportunity which I did take. It was only a very good judgement on my part on the gap down opening following the one big down day, that allowed me to sneak away with some money. That was the only pullback at all of any kind for quite awhile here. Even though I was able to time that, overall I would have to say that trade was lousy. Just look at this chart, is it really a market you want to have been trying to short? Obviously not.

There are once again a couple of things that are saying we could short this market here. We have some divergence in the Pro Go Indicator, and one of the momentum oscillators is also indicating a down trend. However, the longer term momentum indicator shows an uptrend which of course we can see just from looking at the chart of the price. We hardly need anything fancy to see that.

As a short term trader for the most part, I am tempted by what we see above except the one thing I do not like about it is the inside bar with a down close. In certain instances they are good setup bars, and you have tight stops for the entries. However, with a trend this strong, I just want a bit more than this to short this market. It certainly is not a buy for me here under any circumstance even though I do expect this rally to continue for awhile. We are extremely extended on a short term basis, so a sharp correction is coming. Sharp nowadays could just be a couple of weeks or less, this is one of the strongest trends I have ever seen in stocks.

This post is more of a thinking out loud, inner monologue for me. I have alot of the casino's money in the bank this month, so I am going to be very picky about entries for the balance of the month. There are several individual stocks that are setting up short entries, so I do believe we are close to a minor peak here. I urge you caution in equating politics to the markets. Alot of the negative things that are going on will not effect the markets on a short term basis. The long term effects I think we all know, but until we get something telling us the trend has changed be careful about big short positions. If and when this trend changes it will be obvious,  if we miss the peak we can enter on the first retracement. Some of the commodity markets are developing sideways trading ranges, so we may correct by moving sideways here.

Another good month is close at hand, so I would expect fund managers to try and hold this up with all they got, especially with it also being a quarterly ending period as well.



3 comments:

John G. said...

Chris, this is a follow up on your 2% risk/7% drawdown comment on your last post.

I solely trade S&P 500 futures. I understand 'no more than 7% drawdown' to mean to step out of a wager if my $100K account goes down $7K. My question is on the '2% at risk amount.' Each S&P 500 contract is worth approximately $55K, with initial margin of approximately $6K. Given a $100K trading account, how many contracts does the '2% at risk' pencil out to?

And, I agree with your comment on the last thread; I, too, no longer have the stomach for big drawdowns, after having lost 80% of my short-term/trading account by betting against the trend last year.

Thanks!

Chris Johnston said...

The 2% risk on a 100k account would be $2,000. It sounds like you trade the big contract, I would suggest going to the ES ( E mini ). Fills are much better and it is much more liquid in general. Plus you can dial in the risk better. You cannot trade one big contract and only risk 2k, that stop would be way too close, however on a mini which is 1/5th that would be 40 points which is plenty of room. I only trade the ES contract, I got tired of the lousy fills on the big contract many years ago.

So since 1 Big contract is equal to 5 ES contracts you can trade a portion of a big contract. I have to admit I do not know what the margins even are on it because I trade so much under on my possible margin that it is not even an issue.

If you want to risk 2% and the stop is $1000 per emini on your trade then you trade 2 contracts. If you are a really aggressive trader maybe go to 5% but going beyond that means that if you have 3 straight losses you quickly get to a 20%ish drawdown and that is too big. 3 losses in a row can easily happen at any time and should not cripple you when it does. Trading just one market makes 3 losses in a row less likely but it is still going to happen no matter how good you are.

John G. said...

Got it; 2% is an absolute dollar stop loss limit, which is a function of (1) the number of contracts and (2) the point loss limit per contract. I.e., if one trades fewer contracts, one can have looser stops, while if one trades more contracts, one must have tighter stops.

Makes sense. Thanks, Chris!